Insect Farming? A Closer Look at the Sustainability and Safety Claims

As concerns over the environmental toll and public health impacts of conventional animal agriculture intensify, many have turned their attention to insect farming as a potential alternative protein source to feed a growing human population. Positioned as a more sustainable solution, insect rearing operations have rapidly proliferated across the globe. 

However, a growing body of research suggests this fledgling industry may not be the panacea promoters claim and could carry its own ecological, safety, and social hazards that warrant scrutiny.

Rapid Growth Raises Concerns

The projected growth figures alone for insect farming raise questions about hasty adoption outpacing scientific evaluation. Current forecasts suggest by 2030, over 10 percent of fish servings and 1 in 40 eggs consumed in the European Union could come from insect-fed animals. For an unproven production method still in its nascency, such a lightning-fast scale-up seems unwise.

Food Safety Risks

A 2018 risk assessment by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) as well as additional peer-reviewed studies have flagged significant food safety concerns around insect farming.

Among these are alarming levels of pathogenic bacteria like salmonella, Enterobacteriaceae (the family of bacteria including E.coli), bacillus cereus, and high yeast and mold counts present in edible insect products. There are multiple points of entry for these pathogens to contaminate insect products; for example, in the case of salmonella, “contaminated substrate, insufficient hygienic measures, or lack of measures for preventing the entrance of undesired pests can all cause [its] introduction into insect production facilities.”

Research indicates hazardous heavy metals, pesticide residues, and other chemical toxins could also be present in insect harvests, though data remains limited on the full scope of this threat. Introducing a new category of potential contaminants into food and feed supplies warrants extra caution, and rigorous safety protocols that have yet to be developed.

Environmental Concerns

From an environmental perspective, insect farming operations may not represent the sustainability solution they're purported to be. Evidence suggests these industrial facilities are likely to cause similar levels of environmental damage through polluting waste and ecological disruption as other animal agriculture operations. There are also concerns around the use of non-native insect species that could escape and become invasive threats, damaging local ecosystems and biodiversity. As international trade of insect products grows, the potential for such infiltrations increases in parallel.

Efficiency Claims in Question

Even insect farming's proposed advantages over traditional livestock aren't born out by the data. While marketed as an efficient alternative feed source, studies show insect species have relatively poor feed conversion ratios – in many cases, consuming more crops than the amount of insect protein produced. Two of the most common insects used for farming, mealworms and crickets, have conversion ratios similar to that of pigs, which require over three pounds of grain to produce a single pound of pork. This fact alone undercuts claims of insects being a more sustainable protein source.

Worker Health and Safety Issues

Another issue lies with worker health and safety risks in insect rearing facilities. A 2022 study found that 60 percent of insect factory employees reported respiratory issues believed to be caused by exposure, with most showing signs of insect allergies and bronchial inflammation. Moreover, with allergic cross-reactivity observed between insects and shellfish/dust mites, insect-based food and ingredient products can trigger potentially life-threatening reactions in consumers sensitized to related allergens.

Perpetuating Intensive Farming Practices

It's worth noting that the majority of insects raised industrially will be directed toward livestock and farmed fish feed markets rather than direct human consumption. But using insects for this purpose only perpetuates many of the same environmental and ethical criticisms levied at intensive animal farming practices.

Corporate Involvement Raises Eyebrows

Another reason to remain skeptical about this new industry is the fact that major meat companies are beginning to invest in – and build out – insect farming and related infrastructure. Last year, Tyson Foods invested in Protix, a Netherlands-based insect ingredients maker, and is partnering with the company to build a U.S. factory. Given these companies’ long history of social and environmental negligence, we can scarcely trust them to uphold responsible practices as they enter into this burgeoning sector.

The Need for Scrutiny

Ultimately, the evidence suggests insect agriculture falls short of being the panacea for building a truly sustainable and ethical food system that its proponents claim. Rather than continuing to funnel resources into an underregulated sector rife with potential public health, environmental, and social risks, a more pragmatic approach would apply serious scrutiny to insect farming's true costs and limitations.

Rushing headlong without such analyses could leave us trapped in yet another vicious cycle perpetuating many of industrial animal agriculture's ills that insect farming was supposed to solve. As we aim to address the social and ecological harms of our industrialized food system, it’s essential that we avoid becoming entrenched in a new industry that continues to harm consumers and the environment.

More like this:

Previous
Previous

Bird Flu’s Spread to Cows and Humans Raises Pandemic Alarm

Next
Next

New USDA Census Raises Concern about Family Farm Loss, Increased Consolidation